Language : 
Book a Free Consultation
(410) 995-1515
Available 24/7 Free Consultation
(410) 995-1515
Maryland Legal News / 1.14.2015

Marylands Cap on Damages Challenged by Maryland Family

In 2008, Manuel Espina was shot by a Prince George’s County police officer and his family sued the county because the officer was a local government employee. Maryland has a law from the 1980s that li
Table of Contents

    In 2008, Manuel Espina was shot by a Prince George’s County police officer and his family sued the county because the officer was a local government employee. Maryland has a law from the 1980s that limits the amount of money people can receive when suing a local government employee to $200,000 per plaintiff or $500,000 for claims connected to a single incident. The Espina family is asking Maryland’s highest court to strike down the law because their damage award of $11.5 million was cut down to $400,000.

    Other localities in Maryland, not surprisingly, have taken the side of Prince George’s County, arguing that “ruling in favor of the family could force local governments to pay out millions more when officers are sued for civil rights violations.” The family’s attorneys and many civil rights groups believe that having a cap on damages will never deter local governments from combatting police brutality. Groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union, the Public Justice Center, and the Caucus of African American Leaders all filed briefs supporting the Espina family. They believe “that larger penalties are necessary to ensure justice in police brutality cases” and “the cap doesn’t deter officers from repeated misconduct—especially if they escape criminal charges over the accusations.” The police officer involved here was not prosecuted in the killing and a police trial board acquitted him of administrative charges.

    In Baltimore, the cap has saved taxpayers millions of dollars because since 2011, there have been 102 civil suits alleging police brutality and other misconduct, and yet $5.7 million has still been paid out. Baltimore City, for example, has argued that “the cap is needed to protect budgets and predict exposure for insurance purposes.” So while local governments are worried about their budgets, families of victims of police brutality or other misconduct are limited to a few hundred thousand dollars in damages for their loss, even when juries return multi-million dollar damage awards. The cap has been challenged and upheld numerous times. It will certainly be interesting to see if the Maryland Court of Appeals holds its ground and upholds the cap, or if this case is ripe for overturning it.

    Share This Story

    Think others could benefit? Share this information and expect more impact.
    Contact Us

    Expect More with
    Portner & Shure

    The legal system can be intimidating, but you deserve more. Expect more guidance, more dedication, and more results from our experienced trial attorneys every step of the way.

    Free Confidential Consultation:
    (410) 995-1515
    Columbia Office
    7226 Lee DeForest Dr,
    Suite 100,
    Columbia, MD 21046
    Map & Directions
    Bel Air Office
    3 Vale Road,
    Suite 100,
    Bel Air, MD 21014
    Map & Directions
    Frederick Office
    5216 Chairmans Court,
    Suite 106,
    Frederick, MD 21703
    Map & Directions
    Glen Burnie Office
    7310 Ritchie Hwy,
    #409,
    Glen Burnie, MD 21601
    Map & Directions
    Richmond Office
    9100 Arboretum Parkway,
    Suite 270,
    Richmond, VA 23236
    Map & Directions
    Raleigh Office
    421 Fayetteville St,
    #1100,
    Raleigh, NC 27601
    Map & Directions
    Salisbury Office
    100 E. Main Street,
    Suite 503,
    Salisbury, MD 21801
    Map & Directions
    Silver Spring Office
    8455 Colesville Road,
    Suite 720,
    Silver Spring, MD 20910
    Map & Directions
    Vienna Office
    8229 Boone Boulevard,
    Suite 100,
    Vienna, VA 22182
    Map & Directions
    The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute client relationship.
    uploadmagnifiercross